Astor Place Tower
445 Lafayette Street, New York, N.Y.
Buildings Home >
Case Studies: Mixed Use > Astor
Place Tower An
unusual trapezoidal site in Manhattan is the setting for Astor Place
Tower, a 21-story residential condominium building at Fourth Avenue
and Astor Place. Construction on the 140,000-square-foot building,
completed in 2006, made it a showcase for the versatility of reinforced
concrete.
This $50-million “rotational, asymmetrical structure”
includes mixed-use commercial space and a residential condominium
tower. The complex contains 39 luxury residential loft units, 13,000
square feet of retail space, a below-grade parking garage for residents’
cars, and penthouse gallery space for Cooper Union, the owner of
the site.
The building's design consists of three basic elements: a limestone
and glass retail podium; a serpentine glass and aluminum tower;
and a butt glazed, zinc column, spandrel frame, tower hat. The most
notable feature of this building is its curved perimeter layout.
The design’s three setback levels help conjure a resemblance
to a grand piano. The exterior of the building also features a 5,000-square-foot
urban plaza connecting Cooper Square and Lafayette Street.
The building features a striking and complicated curved design by
Charles Gwathmey, principal with Gwathmey Siegel & Associates.
Adding to the challenge for DeSimone Consulting Engineers, the structural
engineer, was the presence of two different street gridlines, says
Michael Gabbay, Senior Vice President of Plaza Construction, general
contractor on the project.
"The configuration of the building is such that the curves
at the concrete slabs had to be laid out carefully," Gabbay
says. "We had to maintain the integrity of the design by preserving
the curvature of the slab. Concrete was the ideal material to make
the curves for the shape of the building."
According to the architect, the design draws on the iconic Flatiron
Building farther uptown for inspiration. Astor Place also pays tribute
to ancient masters of architecture. "The second, more historical
precedent we looked to was the obelisks of ancient Egypt,"
Gwathmey says. "By its sculptural clarity, the obelisk is the
acknowledged object that defines that place. We wanted to introduce
a distinct object as opposed to making an extended-wall building."
Gwathmey says that using steel would have taken more time. "Concrete
is more natural and appropriate," he adds. "It is efficient
and incredibly fast in terms of structurally framing the building,
which did not have the same floor plate on each floor. It is asymmetrical
as it spirals to the top."
Concrete also allowed for thicker slabs at transfer floors to support
the building's irregular shape, with slabs 24 and 28 inches thick
at the 17th floor and 14 inches thick on the transfer slab at the
21st floor. DeSimone's engineering plan called for using 8,000-psi
concrete with silica fume to strengthen shear walls and transfer
floors.
A reinforced concrete flat plate system with shear walls was chosen
for Astor Place, as it provides the most economical structural system
for the project’s intricate architectural and programmatic
layout. Maintaining the integrity of the architect’s design,
concrete is easily shaped to any form and does not require extra
material or “skins” to buttress the system. Placement
of embedded reinforcement at the perimeter was curved to follow
the façade’s strict geometrical requirements, and allowed
for the curtain wall to be easily attached to the structural slabs
by means of embedded anchors.
The trapezoid-shaped site is near a subway and historic pre-war
buildings. In order not to disturb these sensitive neighbors, drilled
H-shaped piles and concrete filled steel caissons were used.
The building employs a reinforced concrete frame, featuring flat
slab construction and exposed concrete columns. The amoeba-like
floor slabs do not always line up with the floors above or below.
Slabs were formed on site using custom-made wood forms. Typical
tower floors consist of 8-inch-thick slabs supported by a system
of round perimeter columns. Floors utilized a maximum of 5 interior
columns. Shear walls provide the lateral support against wind and
seismic loads.
The building is like a multi-tiered layer cake, with setbacks that
accommodate roof terraces, but further complicate the design. The
first setback occurs at the 3rd floor, just above the podium levels,
and required curved concrete beams to make up for the elevation
difference between the terrace and tower layouts. An integral cantilever
concrete beam system was used in conjunction with the curved perimeter
beams to transfer a perimeter column at the building’s southwest
corner. Steel reinforcement for this transfer system was extensively
detailed to enable the main bars, stirrups, and hanger reinforcement
to work effortlessly in conjunction with each other.
The second setback level occurs at the 17th floor. At this transfer
mat slab, concrete columns are discontinued from below and transferred
to accommodate the shift and change in programmatic layouts from
the floors above. This level utilizes a 24-inch-thick mat slab.
The building again steps back at the 21st floor, where columns are
discontinued and transferred via a 20-inch-thick mat slab. This
transfer created loads that induced stresses not often found in
conventional residential slab situations. Here transfer slabs were
reinforced using mid-height bars, stirrup cages around columns,
and Decon studrails.
Astor Place possesses other unique structural characteristics.
The basement level, containing services and parking, is accessed
via a ramp that also serves as the bracing system for the structure’s
southern wall. The southern portion of the ground floor slab is
designed to accommodate additional planting and tree loads. As well,
the building’s southern wall extends 15 feet, unbraced, above
ground to accommodate a signage/party wall. To help maintain the
glass curtain wall, a revolving window-washing tower beam was installed
on the upper roof slab, and a 22-inch-thick transfer mat was designed
to help support the resultant downward and uplift loads imposed.
A key advantage of conventional flat plate systems is the reduction
of floor to floor heights, which significantly reduces the cost
of formwork and building frame. The flat plate lends itself to the
use of conventional plywood construction, while lower floor to floor
heights allow for the use of conventional stick shoring. Building
each floor on a two-day cycle is facilitated by the simplified formwork.
A trend set in the late sixties, the aggressive two-day cycle is
the preferred method of construction in New York City, made possible
by the moderate spans and lower floor to floor heights common in
residential hi-rise flat plate construction. Unprecedented in office
building construction, the two-day cycle will reduce the floor completion
schedule by 50% compared to an equivalent structural steel floor
system.
The lateral force resisting system efficiently incorporates the
flat plate with a 16-inch-thick concrete shear wall that completely
encases the fire stair from the ground floor. Located at the rear
of the property, and in keeping with post 9-11 concerns, all means
of egress are protected with 16-inch impact resistant concrete shear
walls. These vertical structural elements also maximize the rentable
floor space and provide economical drift control of the structure
for occupant comfort.
Higher strength concrete (12000 psi) was chosen by the design team
to reduce the size of the tower columns and increase rentable space.
In addition, cast-in-place concrete construction provided superior
acoustic properties, fireproofing at no additional cost, and enhanced
robustness in the event of terrorist attacks.
|
 |

Case Studies:
Cultural Buildings
Educational Institutions
Green Buildings
Healthcare
Hospitality
ICF Buildings
Luxury Residential
Mixed Use
Office Buildings
Religious Structures
Tilt-Up Buildings
| Owner: Related Companies,
New York, N.Y.
Architect: Gwathmey Siegel & Associates,
New York, N.Y.
Structural Engineer: DESIMONE Consulting
Engineers, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
|
|