Buildings 
Home
 

Overview 

Design Aids 

Building  Presentations 

Software 
Solutions
 

Resources 

Technical 
Support
 

Regional  Contacts 


Museum Towers
Buildings Home > Application: Design Flexibility... > Museum Towers

One of the newest high-rise luxury residences in the Boston area is the Museum Towers at North Point in Cambridge.

Located across from the Museum of Science and overlooking Boston's historic Back Bay and Charles River, Museum Towers consists of two 24-story towers attached at the base with a central lobby, one six-story building that is joined to one of the towers, and a three level post-tensioned parking garage.

The buildings house 435 one- and two-bedroom apartments, penthouse apartments, and a full-service health club with an Olympic-size lap pool. One of the most important factors that contributed to the overall success of this project was the collaboration between the general contractor, subcontractors, and design team that resulted in cost-effective and timesaving solutions, as outlined below. Another critical element was familiarization and training of a skilled labor force with a unique forming system.

Structural System
The overall plan dimensions of a typical tower floor are 101 ft by 101 ft (30.8 m by 30.8 m), with spans varying between 13 and 24 ft (4.0 and 7.3 m). A conventionally reinforced 8-in. (200-mm) thick concrete slab was chosen for the floor system. Twenty-four in. (610-mm) square columns are used for the full height of the tower, with varying amounts of reinforcing steel.

The lateral force resisting system consists of 14-in. (355-mm) thick shear walls in a 40 ft by 40 ft (12.2 by 12.2 m) core area, and four 12-in. (305-mm) thick outrigger walls that extend from the core walls to the exterior of the building. The outrigger walls, used to reduce the drift of the building, are located between the 2nd to 4th, 13th to 15th, and 21st to 23rd floors.
Normal weight concrete with a specified compressive strength of 4,000 psi (25 MPa) is utilized for the framing members, except for the columns and shear walls in the lower 8 floors which are 5,000 psi (35 MPa).
The foundation consists of 14 in. by 14 in. (355 mm by 355 mm) precast concrete piles with a 120 ton (1,070 kN) capacity.

Design Loads
The buildings are designed in accordance with the 5th edition of the Massachusetts Building Code. It is important to note that seismic forces governed the lateral design, with the seismic base shear equal to 3.5% of the weight of the building.

Construction Data
Four to five days was a typical cycle for each floor. The shear walls were constructed first, three floors ahead of the slabs and columns. The walls were formed with the Peri Formworks system, supplied by Peri North America, Baltimore. Skydeck, the high-strength lightweight aluminum slab formwork which was also supplied by Peri, was used for the slabs. The Skydeck allowed for removal of the form panels and beams without removal of the shores, thereby eliminating the need to reshore. Strength accelerators were used in the concrete mix for the floor slabs in order to achieve 1,500 psi (10 MPa) within 24 hours. This strength was needed in order to allow safe stripping of the forms.


In order to familiarize the local labor force with the Peri systems, the Reinforced Concrete Construction Committee (RC3), Boston, worked with the local unions in acquiring test systems of the formwork. This training proved extremely valuable when the actual project began.
To achieve a four to five day cycle, seven levels of shoring would normally be required. Weidlinger Associates, Inc., the structural engineer for the project, performed a finite element analysis of the floor slabs and shoring and determined that only four levels of shoring would be needed. The engineers worked in conjunction with the University of Vermont to assure the accuracy of the finite element analysis. Measurements obtained from load cells located on judiciously chosen shoring members compared very closely to the results of the analysis. The collaboration between the contractors and the structural engineer resulted in significant savings in time and money.


A typical cycle was as follows:

Day 1 - place the floor forms;
Day 2 - place the slab reinforcing steel;
Day 3 - pour the slab;
Day 4 - erect the column reinforcing steel and pour the columns to the next floor.

Minimizing crane time was key to construction scheduling. Time-to-completion was enhanced due to the fact that the Peri systems move up the tower at all times and never have to be brought back to the ground. The contractor also took advantage of the fact that there was two identical towers, and cycled work crews between the two so that both towers would be completed at the same time.

Concrete Versus Steel Framing
Both reinforced concrete and structural steel framing schemes were considered for the towers in the preliminary design stages of the project. The concrete system was clearly the most advantageous alternative for the following reasons.


Although local zoning limits the height of construction to less than 85 ft (25.9 m), the developer worked with the City of Cambridge to obtain a tower height of 234 ft (71.3 m). By using the flat plate system, the floor-to-floor height is 8 ft - 8 in. (2.6 m), compared to 10 ft (3.0 m) that would have been required for the steel system. Thus, by using the concrete scheme, two additional levels were added to each of the towers for the same building height, resulting in a greater number of rentable units per tower.


An additional significant cost savings was realized by using the flat plat system, since the underside of the slab was used as the finished ceiling for the floor below. By working closely with the precast concrete contractor, simplicity of formwork was further achieved by supporting the precast panels directly on the columns, thereby eliminating the need for perimeter edge beams.


The overall time-to-completion of the project was a clear advantage of the concrete system. Excavation and pile driving began in late November of 1996, and both towers were completed in October of 1997. The faster completion time translates into earlier tenant occupancy, and, thus, an earlier return on the developer's investment.

Credits
Developer: Congress Group Ventures, Cambridge, MA
Architect: Jung/Brannen Associates
Structural Engineer: Weidlinger Associates, Inc., Cambridge, MA
General Contractor: Beacon Skanska/Congress Group Construction Corp. (joint venture)
Concrete Contractor: S&F Concrete Contractors
Concrete Supplier: Boston Sand & Gravel
Reinforcing Steel Supplier: Barker Steel
Reinforcing Steel Placer: Bart Lund Steel Services
Precast Concrete Contractor: Consolidated Precast


Other Applications:
Design Flexibility...
Performance & Safety
Today's Wired Buildings

 
Careers | Sitemap | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | © 2008 Portland Cement Association - All Rights Reserved