Non-Combustible Concrete Construction
Buildings Home
> Codes and Standards > Non-Combustible Concrete Construction
Life Safety for Multi-Family Homes
Where
There’s Smoke, There’s Fire. And,
too often, they result in loss of property, injury, and death. Fires
in apartments, condominiums, hotels, motels, dormitories, and assisted
living/nursing homes destroy property and disrupt lives; they also
disfigure, disable, and kill. Is there a way to protect ourselves
and our families, our homes, and cherished possessions from fire’s
devastating effects? The non-combustible concrete construction industries
have long advocated balanced design for property protection and
life safety. Balanced design combines active systems (fire detection
and suppression) with passive containment and control through the
use of non-combustible fire-resistive walls, floors, and roofs.
Building Construction Has Changed
Over the last thirty years, promotion of active systems—sprinklers—has
resulted in compromises in building construction materials to offset
increased costs associated with these systems. Dare we depend solely
on suppression devices to fight fire and save lives? The latest
information from the United States Fire Incidence Reporting System
(USFIRS) suggests not.
Fire Losses
in Multi-Family Structures* |
| Apartments |
Hotels/Motels |
Dormitories |
| Fires |
86,500 |
1,946 |
740 |
| Deaths |
445 |
9 |
2 |
| Deaths per 1000 Incidences |
5.1 |
4.6 |
2.7 |
| Injuries |
5,000 |
110 |
61 |
| Injuries per 1000 Incidences |
53.1 |
56.5 |
82.4 |
| Loss ($ million) |
631 |
23 |
4 |
| Loss ($ million) per 1000 incidences |
2.34 |
11.90 |
5.49 |
*The latest
information available from the NFIRS in 2002 is based on 1998
data. |
Fire Statistics (1,2)
During the 1990s, the number of deaths, injuries, and property
damage reported per fire incidence in apartments remained fairly
constant, despite increased use of active systems.This statistical
stagnation— rather than improvement—is most likely the
result of a recent trend in building codes to require automatic
fire suppression systems while simultaneously reducing or eliminating
compartmentation requirements.
Who’s
at Risk? We are all vulnerable to the ravages of fire. But
at greater risk are people who cannot respond or evacuate in time.
Infants and children, people with hearing or visual impairments,
and people with mental and physical disabilities. The United States
Fire Administration (3) is concerned
about housing the elderly, the fastest growing segment of the population.
Adults age 65-75 have a fire death rate of twice the national average;
75-85, three times the average; and over 85, four times the average.
Our nation’s senior citizens suffer vision, hearing, and mobility
impairment, with 82% of those over 65 categorized as significantly
disabled. And the steady rise in the U.S. elderly population is
projected to continue— peaking around 2020. Current methods
to alert seniors of fire and afford evacuation time are inadequate.
We need to assure that structures built today incorporate comprehensive
balanced design to protect these precious individuals—our
parents and grandparents—from the rapid spread of fire.
Balanced Design for life safety and
property protection is a combination of three key elements: smoke
detection, fire suppression, and compartmentation to provide for
fire containment. Construction incorporating all three components
provides valuable backup in the event of active system failure,
a fairly common occurrence. Balanced design should be the standard
in all multi-family homes. Recent building code changes adopted
at the expense of compartmentation should be reconsidered with fire
sprinkler systems deemed adjuncts to fire-safe construction. Without
provisions for balanced design in building codes, responsibility
is placed on owners or state and local officials to demand or designers
to recommend that adequate fire safety be incorporated into multi-family
homes.
 |
 |
 |
| Options for non-combustible concrete
construction include cast-in-place and hollow-core precast concrete
floors, ceilings, and roofs; and cast-in place concrete, precast
concrete, or concrete masonry walls. |
Fire
Containment with walls, floors, and ceilings limits the area
of fire spread and provides a last line of defense should sprinklers
fail. To be effective, walls and floors/ceilings providing compartmentation
should be of non-combustible construction with at least 2 hours
of fire resistance. Non-combustible concrete and masonry walls and
floors do not produce smoke or generate toxic fumes. They are always
at the ready providing passive fire containment and protecting life
and property, while affording firefighters more time to safely focus
their efforts on extinguishing a blaze rather than containing it.
Options for non-combustible concrete construction include cast-in-place
and hollow-core precast concrete floors, ceilings, and roofs; and
cast-in place concrete, precast concrete, or concrete masonry walls.
Smoke Detection systems
are primarily intended to provide early warning of a fire, giving
occupants time to evacuate a building safely. However, recent figures
(4) show that 31% of apartment
fire deaths occurred in buildings where smoke detectors were present
and in working order. (See Table 2.) Nineteen percent of the deaths
occurred in buildings where smoke detectors were present but inoperable—virtually
no improvement since 1996, when the percentages were 30% and 18%,
respectively. The grim and unchanging reality is that 50% of apartment
fire deaths occur even when smoke detectors are present.
Smoke
Alarm Presence in Apartment Residences* |
| Smoke Alarm Present and Operated |
Smoke Alarm Present and Did Not Operate |
No Smoke Alarm |
| % of Fires |
% of Deaths |
% of Fires |
% of Deaths |
% of Fires |
% of Deaths |
| 40 |
31 |
20 |
19 |
18 |
18 |
| *The latest information available
from the NFIRS in 2002 is based on 1998 data. |
Fire Suppression systems
are primarily intended to control fires until the fire service arrives.
In some cases sprinklers will extinguish a fire. The National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) 13R standard—which governs the
installation of sprinkler systems in residential buildings up to
and including four stories—does not require all areas to be
sprinklered, including combustible concealed spaces such as floor/ceiling
assemblies and attics. If a fire originates in an unsprinklered
space it is not likely to be controlled, and considerable property
damage or total destruction may occur; even worse is the increased
possibility of injury or loss of life. Diligent maintenance that
must continue throughout the life of the structure is required to
assure proper system functioning. Even then, sprinklers may be out
of service during maintenance or may fail due to water outages or
system glitches.
Non-Combustible Concrete Construction.
To achieve true balanced design and reduce deaths, injuries, and
property loss, the multi-family building community should consider
non-combustible concrete construction. Various affordable products
and systems exist to satisfy design requirements and fire resistance
ratings. Options include cast-in-place or hollow-core precast concrete
floors, ceiling, and roofs; and cast-in-place concrete, precast
concrete, or concrete masonry walls. Non-combustible concrete construction
benefits occupants, owners, and communities alike.
Advantages
of Non-Combustible Concrete Construction |
| For Owners/Developers |
For Occupants |
For Communities |
Speed of construction
Faster sales and re-sales
Lower operating costs
Lower insurance costs
Lower maintenance costs
Lower energy costs
Lowest life-cycle costs
Higher appreciation
Attracts quality oriented occupants
Appeals to investors
Proven performance
Community acceptance
Resistant to seismic and high wind damage
|
Fire safe non-combustible construction
Does not burn
Does not produce smoke, fumes or gases
Does not add fuel to the fire
Provides minimum two-hour separation between units
Serves passively for the life of the building
Lower insurance costs
Needs no testing or inspection
No bouncy or creaky floors
Superior acoustic qualities
Security for occupants and contents |
Lower risk and exposure for the fire service
More efficient use of fire services
Construction does not add fuel to the fire
Fire is contained
Adjacent units are protected
Structural collapse is unlikely
Provides quality community asset for many decades
Community recognized for its fire safe construction
Provides a stable tax base for the community
Attracts long term investors to the community. |
What To Do. When renting
or buying a home in a multi-family building, lodging overnight away
from home, or housing loved ones in dormitories or nursing facilities,
consider buildings that provide all three components of balanced
design. Look for smoke detectors, sprinkler systems, and ask if
walls, floors, and roofs are of concrete construction. Urge local
building code officials to assure that multi-family homes are constructed
using all three components of balanced fire-safe design, including
the critical component: non-combustible concrete construction.
| Look for the Three Key Elements
of Balanced Design |
- Smoke detection
- Fire suppression
- Compartmentation to provide for fire containment
|
Containment Story #1
Dormitory Fire Contained
On
October 11, 2001, fire engulfed the Rees Hall Dormitory at Hobart
and William Smith Colleges in Geneva, New York. Temperatures as
high as 1800°F melted plastic picture frames, light fixtures,
and smoke detectors, outside the room and warped metal hinges and
the steel door of the room where the fire started. In just 20 minutes,
the raging fire caused about $100,000 of damage—a small repair
bill, considering that concrete construction saved the building
from being completely destroyed.
Originally constructed in 1969 with concrete masonry and hollow-core
floor planks, the building is “durable and fire resistant,”
says Christopher J. Button, Senior Project Manager, HWS, “and
has much lower maintenance and insurance costs.” Replacing
the entire structure would have cost as much as $5 million.
Button says he’d always believed any building with a smoke
detector and non-combustible materials would withstand similar catastrophes,
but after seeing how concrete stood up to the intense fire, he’s
“a believer in concrete construction.”
Containment Story #2
Balanced Design Saves Perry Hall
In
Baltimore, Maryland, concrete masonry saved the Perry Hall Apartments
from complete destruction. When the building was under construction,
an arsonist doused it with gasoline and burned an 80 by 40-foot
wood-frame section to the ground. The rest of the building was salvaged
because the concrete masonry fire wall contained the blaze.
Concludes Tony Mazzella, superintendent with Perry Hall builder
Mark Hall & Company: “If all the walls were of wood
frame and gypsum board everything would have had to be replaced.
The entire building would have burned to the ground.”
Containment Story #3
Quality Construction: A Concrete Plus
For Baltimore builder James Keelty & Company, concrete provides
more than fire safety. It contributes to the firm’s reputation
as a quality builder producing multi-family residences. “A
combination of factors goes into our use of concrete masonry,”
says Steve James, Vice President of Keelty. “There
is both a perception and the reality of it being a quality building,
from both the fire resistance and sound transmission aspects, where
concrete performs very well.”
 |
 |
| Robert W. Bertazon – Masonry
Institute of Maryland, Inc. |
References
| 1 Fire in the United
States 1987-1996, Eleventh Edition, United States Fire
Administration, National Fire Data Center, Emmitsburg, Maryland,
August 1999. |
2 Fire in the United States
1989-1998, Twelfth Edition, United States Fire Administration,
National Fire Data Center, Emmitsburg, Maryland, November 2001. |
3 Fire Risks for Older
Adults, United States Fire Administration, National Fire
Data Center, Emmitsburg, Maryland, October 1999. |
4 A Profile of Fire in
the United States 1989-1998, Twelfth Edition, United States
Fire Administration, National Fire Data Center, Emmitsburg,
Maryland, August 2001. |
To purchase printed copies of this publication in
, click here.
|