| Tech Note
Buildings Home
> Design Aids> Soil Sub-grade Modulus
Soil Sub-Grade Modulus
The following are excerpts from the PCA publication Concrete
Floors on Ground (EB075.03). For full treatment of the
subject the reader is advised to consult the original text of the
publication.
Subgrade-Subbase Strength
Soil bearing capacity, soil compressibility, and soil modulus of
subgrade reaction are various measures of strength-deformation properties
of soil. It is important to consider how these parameters apply
to the design of floor slabs.
The allowable soil bearing capacity is the maximum pressure that
can be permitted on foundation soil with adequate safety against
soil rupture or excessive settlement. Allowable soil pressure may
be based on:
- Laboratory shear strength tests (of soil samples) such as the
direct shear test, triaxial compression test, or unconfined compression
test
- Field tests such as the standard penetration test or cone penetrometer
test
- Soil classification
- Moisture-density-strength relationships (established by conducting
strength tests on soil specimens prepared for moisture-density
testing)
Beyond the allowable soil pressure is the ultimate bearing capacity,
the load per unit area (soil pressure) that will reduce failure
by rupture of a supporting soil.
Another soil characteristic, compressibility of cohesive soils,
determines the amount of long-term settlement under load. The usual
method for predicting settlement is based on conducting soil consolidation
tests and determining the compression index for use in the settlement
computations. The compression index may be estimated by correlation
to the liquid limit of the soil.
A third measure of soil strength, Westergaard’s modulus
of subgrade reaction, k, is commonly used in design procedures
for concrete pavements and floors-on-grade that are not structural
elements in the building (floors not supporting columns and load-bearing
walls).
There is no reliable correlation between the three measures of
soil properties-modulus of subgrade reaction, soil bearing capacity,
and soil compressibility-because they are measurements of entirely
different characteristics of a soil. The k-value used for
floor-slab design reflects the response of the subgrade under temporary
(elastic) conditions and small deflections, usually 1.25 mm (0.05
in.) or less. Soil compressibility and bearing capacity values (normally
used to predict and limit differential settlements between footings
or parts of a foundation) reflect total permanent (inelastic) subgrade
deformations that may be 20 to 40 (or more) times greater than the
small deflections on which k-values are based.
Substantial pavement research has shown that elastic deflections
and stresses of the slab can be predicted reasonably well when using
k-value to represent the subgrade response. Consequently,
the control of slab stresses based on the subgrade k-value
is a valid design procedure.
Although the k-value does not reflect the effect of compressible
soil layers at some depth in the subgrade, it is the correct factor
to use in design for wheel loads and other concentrated loads because
soil pressures under a slab of adequate thickness are not excessive.
However, if heavy distributed loads will be applied to the floor,
the allowable soil pressure and the amount of settlement should
be estimated to determine if shear failure or excessive settlement
might occur.
If there are no unusually adverse soil conditions, the design
analysis requires only the determination of the strength of the
subgrade in terms of k. The k-value is measured
by plate-loading tests taken on top of the compacted subgrade (or
subbase, if used). A general procedure for load testing is given
in ASTM D 1196, Standard Test Method for Nonrepetitive Static
Plate Load Tests of Soils and Flexible Pavement Components, for
Use in Evaluation and Design of Airport and Highway Pavements.
This method provides guidance in the field determination of subgrade
modulus with various plate diameters. Design of Slabs on Grade
(ACI 360R) is specifically oriented to the determination of modulus
of subgrade reaction using a 760-mm (30-in.) diameter plate and
gives more detailed information on test methods using this size
plate. This plate is loaded to a deflection not greater than 1.25
mm (0.05 in.), and the k-value is computed by dividing
the unit load by the deflection obtained. A more economical test
using smaller plates (300 mm [12 in.]) that determines a modified
subgrade reaction modulus is mentioned in ACI 360R. In each case,
the units of k are given in pressure per length: MPa/m
in the metric system, or in in.-lb units, pounds per cubic square
inch, or psi per in. or, as commonly expressed, pounds per cubic
inch (pci). The plate load test is no longer commonly run in practice.
Instead, subgrade reaction values are estimated from the California
Bearing Ratio or from the soil classification.
If a high-quality, well-compacted granular subbase is used under
the floor slab, the k-value will increase. On large projects
it may be feasible to construct a test section and perform plate
load tests on top of the subbase.
Subbases
A subbase—the layer of granular material placed on top of
prepared subgrade—is not mandatory for floors on ground. A
granular subbase, however, can provide benefits during the construction
process and afterwards (to the completed floor). During construction,
the subbase functions as a stable work platform for heavy equipment.
When grading and compaction operations do not produce a uniform
subgrade, a granular subbase will provide a cushion for more uniform
slab support by equalizing minor subgrade defects. The cushioning
effect and increased uniformity can be very important for cohesive
soils that are susceptible to reduced bearing support with increases
in moisture content. A subbase also serves as a capillary break,
reducing moisture migration towards the bottom of the completed
slab. A granular subbase can also serve as a collection layer for
radon gas.
Since uniform rather than strong support is the most important
function of the subgrade and subbase for a concrete floor, it follows
that floor strength is achieved most economically by building strength
in to the concrete slab itself-with optimum use of low-cost materials
under the slab.
|