Buildings 
Home
 

Overview 

Design Aids 

Building  Presentations 

Software 
Solutions
 

Resources 

Technical 
Support
 

Regional  Contacts 


Life Cycle Assessment
Buildings Home > Sustainable Design > Life Cycle Assessment

How Does Concrete Fit In the Big Picture?
by Jennifer G. Prokopy

Deaf Northwest’s Chestnut Lane is an assisted living facility located in suburban Portland, Ore., built mostly with concrete. Notable features include Arxx insulating concrete form walls concrete mixes with fly ash, pervious concrete pavement, and an impervious/ waterproof concrete green roof. Photo courtesy of Glacier North West.

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is today’s sustainability buzzword. The USGBC is preparing to integrate LCA into its LEED rating system, and the industry is filled with lively debate about its impact. As LEED matures and other rating systems find their place in the movement, increasing emphasis is placed on the importance of examining all aspects of a structure: not just the building itself, but the embodied energy of materials, the long-term affects of manufacturing processes, the stages of construction, building performance and operations, durability and maintenance of existing structures, and—in the end—demolition, materials recycling, and future land use ramifications. Although LEED considers some of these, USGBC is considering more, and whether the points are weighted correctly.

LCI, LCA: Definitions

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) defines LCA as the “compilation and evaluation of the inputs, outputs and the potential environmental impacts of a product system throughout its life cycle.” Life cycle inventory analysis (LCI), often confused with LCA, is actually the phase of life cycle assessment involving the compilation and quantification of specific inputs and outputs—materials, energy and emissions—for a given product system throughout its life cycle. The difference is key: LCA is big picture; LCI trains a microscope on individual components.

Rita Schenck, executive director for the Institute for Environmental Research and Education (which helped to form the American Center for Life Cycle Assessment in 2001), says LCAs are valuable because they are fact-based. “It’s a measuring tool, pulling all the information into one place,” she says. “An LCA shows you where you can really get better. What has happened historically is that we move pollution from one type
to another, and an LCA can help make sure you’re not doing that.” (Her book, LCA for Mere Mortals, is a valuable tool for beginners—available
for download at www.iere.org.)

From Dust to Demolition: Concrete in the Mix

Concrete has something of a bad rap in certain circles. Some argue that cement production releases CO2, that the embodied energy of the material is too high. But “the flip side to that is aggregate can be attained locally, for lower transportation costs and pollution generated,” says Schenck. And while cement does have a high embodied energy, it is only a fraction of concrete, and its embodied energy is a fraction of the energy used to heat and cool buildings. Concrete can also contain recycled aggregates (derived locally), recycled steel (derived locally), and supplementary cementitious mixtures (often industrial byproducts that would otherwise be landfilled).

Concrete also brings numerous lasting benefits that many believe far outweigh the front-end labor and energy. As Schenck mentioned, locally available materials mean less transportation and pollution. Concrete also offers high thermal mass, contributing to energy efficiency and comfort. Many concrete structures are designed for a 100-year life span. The material’s light color can provide reflectivity that reduces air conditioning loads and helps reduce the urban heat island effect. And when a project is demolished, much of the material can be recycled.

Recycled, Revitalized
End of the runway is not end of the life cycle for Stapleton Airport
In 1995, Stapleton International Airport was replaced with the ultramodern Denver International Airport. Although Stapleton had reached the end of its service life, a massive materials recycling project is in< progress that will revive the area as a family-friendly residential and commercial community.
On completion, 975 acres of concrete and asphalt will be recycled,
yielding enough material to construct a two-lane roadway roughly
10,000 miles in length.
At Denver’s now-closed Stapleton International Airport, 975 acres of concrete and asphalt are being recycled. Recycled concrete aggregates can be used for road building or as aggregate in new concrete construction.
Photo courtesy of Recycled Materials Co., Inc.
Basics of recycled concrete aggregates
Old concrete can be crushed and recycled into many applications. In the U.S., the most popular is road building. A survey recently conducted by the Federal Highway Administration shows that 38 states recycle concrete to create an aggregate base material; 11 recycle it into new portland cement concrete.
Unprocessed recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) can be used as general bulk fill material, in bank protection, base or fill for drainage structures, road construction, noise barriers, and embankments. Processed material can be used in new concrete for many transit applications, as structural grade concrete, for soil-cement pavement bases, and more.
LEED points and other green benefits
Using recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) may help earn points toward LEED credits, says Kerkhoff, both for incorporating recycled materials, and for construction waste management. In addition, recycled aggregate brings the same benefits of conventional concrete. For more on using RCA, see ACI 555R-01: Removal and Reuse of Hardened Concrete. PCA also has many resources on RCA.


This is not to say that the cement industry is sitting on its laurels. On the contrary, manufacturers are working harder than ever to make processes cleaner and more efficient.

Danger of a Narrow Focus

CTLGroup is publishing a paper on the “Perils of Basing Sustainability Decisions on Simple Metrics.” In response to many articles ranking one product over another based on only a few metrics (embodied energy, CO2 emissions, and the weight of raw materials), Authors Martha G. VanGeem, principal engineer, and Medgar Marceau, building science engineer, performed a full LCA of a house modeled with two types of exterior walls, wood-framed and insulating concrete form (ICF).

Conducted according to ISO 14040 series guidelines, with energy modeling based on Phoenix, Miami, Washington, Seattle, and Chicago, the study showed that “the most significant environmental impacts are not from construction products but from the production and household use of electricity and natural gas.” The research shows that studies that examine only a few components can make nearly any product look bad; when the full range of effects is examined, it might be hard to argue with the comprehensive results.

A Weighty Issue

David Shepherd, director of PCA’s sustainability program, says LCAs are the next big battle ground for the green building movement. “LCA is the tool that will allow people to evaluate and compare brand A to brand B,” he says. The big question, he continues, is how boundaries will be set for various impacts.

This is something with which VanGeem is becoming increasingly familiar. VanGeem currently serves on an industry task group addressing weighting issues related to USGBC’s LCA into LEED project. “Weighting is a subjective method of giving relative importance to impacts such as human health, climate change, energy, scarce resources, etc.,” she explains.

Wayne Trusty, president of the Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, says that individual impact indicator methods use different weighting criteria: “For example, when the same LCI data was put through three different impact indicator systems as part of a European LCA of highway construction, the systems produced three very different answers.” He prefers to conduct LCAs with what he calls the “food label approach,” one in which all environmental ingredients and influences are listed—allowing the organization (or owner, developer, etc.) to determine the weight of each component according to their particular situation.

Multiple Systems

Meanwhile, a number of green building systems are currently available in the marketplace with LEED, each with its own take on LCAs.

  • BEES (Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability) 3.0 is a product-to-product materials comparison tool developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (According to VanGeem, it addresses only four possible concrete mixes out of thousands.)

  • Green Globes is an online building and management environmental audit, developed in Canada as a self-assessment tool.

  • Athena Sustainable Materials Institute offers the Environmental Impact Estimator, software that provides an LCA examination of conceptual building designs and renovations of existing structures.

VanGeem says CTLGroup performs energy analyses and uses a few different European developed models to create LCAs, but reports that American clients sometimes prefer not to have a European-based approach. What the North American industry needs, says VanGeem, is a standardized LCA approach that can be universally adopted. Shepherd agrees: “A national organization will establish standards eventually,” he says. But, the process could take a while.

Meanwhile, members of the concrete industry are working together to be better neighbors, cleaner and more efficient in production, better at using recycled materials in the production of cement and concrete, and innovative in divining new uses for the world’s oldest building material. Building a sustainable future is the driving force. “I’m really impressed with what the concrete industry is doing right now that is environmentally positive,” says Schenck.

For More Information on Conducting LCAs
CTLGroup
Athena Sustainable Materials Institute
Institute for Environmental Research and Education
American Center for Life Cycle Assessment
Portland Cement Association
BEES 3.0
Green Globes
USGBC/LEED


About the Author: As principal of Orange Grove Media, an independent communications firm, Jennifer G. Prokopy provides expert writing, editing and media relations services to the construction industry. As president of the Construction Writers Association (CWA), Jenni works with the nation’s top construction journalists and publicists to improve the quality of construction communications. She is a winner of the CWA Marketing Communications Award, recognizing her writing on sustainable construction with concrete, and a graduate of Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism.


 
Careers | Sitemap | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | © 2008 Portland Cement Association - All Rights Reserved