Masonry 
Home
 

Products &  Properties 

Applications 

Resources 

Contractors'  Corner 

Designers &  Specifiers Site 

Technical Documents 

FAQs

Technical 
Support
 

Stay Informed 

Find Masonry  Cement  Suppliers 


How One Home Survived the 2003 California Wildfires
Masonry Home > Products and Properties > 2003 California Wildfires

Peter and Sharen McColl watched helplessly from a nearby roadway as a 100-ft wall of fire swept over their newly built home and horse stables. A few hours earlier, a 4 mile-wide finger of the Cedar Fire had swept across Interstate 8, the multilane freeway connecting southernmost California with Arizona. The fire would stop its push southward only a few more miles past their home.

Masonry house standing on a hill around burned areasWhen the McColls selected the home site—located on a mountain top 1,000 feet above Harbison Canyon, a small community 15 miles east of San Diego—they knew it lay in harm’s way. The sides of the mountain were covered with thick, dry chaparral, and they had decided to leave undisturbed the vegetation that grew among large boulders located only a few feet from their dwelling.

However, although their home was in a more vulnerable position, it survived while over half of those located below in Harbison Canyon were destroyed. The McColls clearly had luck on their side, but they had also made good decisions about how to build their home to withstand the potential threat of a firestorm. These included integrating construction features that met or exceeded those contained in the International Urban-Wildland Interface Code™ (IUWIC™) for structures required to be of Class 1 Ignition-Resistant Construction (see Table 2).

Horse stable of masonry still standing after fire destroyed surrounding areaConcrete masonry was selected for the exterior walls of both the home and the stable, and the roofing of each structure was concrete roof tile. The horse stable was constructed without an eave, where an intense fire exposure might have caused ignition; and the combustible wood framing of the house eaves, including the fascia board, were covered with cement-based stucco. Among other features required by the IUWIC, the dwelling’s windows had double-pane glazing.

There are a number of guides for homeowners who plan to build or retrofit dwellings in urban-wildland interface areas. Such information is important for the education of local citizenry, who are unlikely to read or fully understand why certain building regulations are necessary. A pamphlet published by the Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS), “Is Your Home Protected from Wildfire Disasters? A Homeowners Guide to Retrofit,” is particularly worthwhile. It provides basic information in simple-to-understand language, but is fairly complete.

Piles of Concrete Masonry Units (CMUs) that survived fireAs an example, it explains that structures constructed on sloping properties, like the McColl home site, are particularly at risk because “hot gases rise in front of the fire along the slope face, pre-heating the up-slope vegetation, moving a grass fire up to four times faster with flames twice as long as fire on level ground.” The photo shown here gives some idea of how hot the fire was. Since the McColl’s buildings were still rather new when the fire occurred, unused materials, such as these concrete masonry units, remained on the property. They had been stored on wooden pallets, which were incinerated by the intense heat. The only evidence remaining of the pallets is the charred ashes of a few boards. The brochure also provides three checklists of critical steps that should be taken before, during and after a wildfire strikes.

To get copies of the IBHS brochure, write to Institute for Business & Home Safety, 4775 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa Florida 33617; phone (813) 286-3400; or click here.

Table 2. Comparison of IUWIC Fire-Protection Features Based on Ignition-Resistant Construction Classification
Fire-protection features
Ignition-resistant construction classification
Class 1
Class2
Class 3
Roof coverings
Yes
(Class A)
Yes
(Class B)
Yes
(Class C)
Eaves, fascia and soffits
YES
YES1
NO
Gutters and downspouts
YES
YES
NO
Exterior walls
YES
YES
NO
Unenclosed underfloor areas
YES
YES
YES
Appendages and projections
YES
YES
NO
Window glazing
YES
YES
NO
Exterior doors
YES
YES
NO
Attic and underfloor vents
YES
YES
YES2
Detached accessory structures
YES
YES
NO
1. Protection is less than that required under Class 1. See Table 1 for details.
2. Protection is less than that required under Class 1 and Class 2. See Table 1 for details.


Photos courtesy of Chris Hastings, RCP Block & Brick Inc, Lemon Grove, CA.


 
Careers | Sitemap | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | © 2008 Portland Cement Association - All Rights Reserved