How One Home Survived the 2003 California Wildfires
Masonry Home > Products
and Properties > 2003 California Wildfires Peter and
Sharen McColl watched helplessly from a nearby roadway as a 100-ft
wall of fire swept over their newly built home and horse stables.
A few hours earlier, a 4 mile-wide finger of the Cedar Fire had
swept across Interstate 8, the multilane freeway connecting southernmost
California with Arizona. The fire would stop its push southward
only a few more miles past their home.
When
the McColls selected the home site—located on a mountain top
1,000 feet above Harbison Canyon, a small community 15 miles east
of San Diego—they knew it lay in harm’s way. The sides
of the mountain were covered with thick, dry chaparral, and they
had decided to leave undisturbed the vegetation that grew among
large boulders located only a few feet from their dwelling.
However, although their home was in a more vulnerable position,
it survived while over half of those located below in Harbison Canyon
were destroyed. The McColls clearly had luck on their side, but
they had also made good decisions about how to build their home
to withstand the potential threat of a firestorm. These included
integrating construction features that met or exceeded those contained
in the International Urban-Wildland Interface Code™
(IUWIC™) for structures required to be of Class 1 Ignition-Resistant
Construction (see Table 2).
Concrete
masonry was selected for the exterior walls of both the home and
the stable, and the roofing of each structure was concrete roof
tile. The horse stable was constructed without an eave, where an
intense fire exposure might have caused ignition; and the combustible
wood framing of the house eaves, including the fascia board, were
covered with cement-based stucco. Among other features required
by the IUWIC, the dwelling’s windows had double-pane glazing.
There are a number of guides for homeowners who plan to build or
retrofit dwellings in urban-wildland interface areas. Such information
is important for the education of local citizenry, who are unlikely
to read or fully understand why certain building regulations are
necessary. A pamphlet published by the Institute for Business &
Home Safety (IBHS), “Is Your Home Protected from Wildfire
Disasters? A Homeowners Guide to Retrofit,” is particularly
worthwhile. It provides basic information in simple-to-understand
language, but is fairly complete.
As
an example, it explains that structures constructed on sloping properties,
like the McColl home site, are particularly at risk because “hot
gases rise in front of the fire along the slope face, pre-heating
the up-slope vegetation, moving a grass fire up to four times faster
with flames twice as long as fire on level ground.” The photo
shown here gives some idea of how hot the fire was. Since the McColl’s
buildings were still rather new when the fire occurred, unused materials,
such as these concrete masonry units, remained on the property.
They had been stored on wooden pallets, which were incinerated by
the intense heat. The only evidence remaining of the pallets is
the charred ashes of a few boards. The brochure also provides three
checklists of critical steps that should be taken before, during
and after a wildfire strikes.
To get copies of the IBHS brochure, write to Institute for Business
& Home Safety, 4775 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa Florida 33617;
phone (813) 286-3400; or click
here.
Table
2. Comparison of IUWIC Fire-Protection Features Based on Ignition-Resistant
Construction Classification |
Fire-protection
features |
Ignition-resistant
construction classification |
Class 1 |
Class2 |
Class 3 |
| Roof coverings |
Yes
(Class A)
|
Yes
(Class B)
|
Yes
(Class C)
|
| Eaves, fascia and soffits |
YES |
YES1 |
NO |
| Gutters and downspouts |
YES |
YES |
NO |
| Exterior walls |
YES |
YES |
NO |
| Unenclosed underfloor areas |
YES |
YES |
YES |
| Appendages and projections |
YES |
YES |
NO |
| Window glazing |
YES |
YES |
NO |
| Exterior doors |
YES |
YES |
NO |
| Attic and underfloor vents |
YES |
YES |
YES2 |
| Detached accessory structures |
YES |
YES |
NO |
1. Protection is less
than that required under Class 1. See Table
1 for details.
2. Protection is less than that required under Class 1 and Class
2. See Table 1 for
details. |
Photos courtesy of Chris Hastings, RCP Block & Brick Inc, Lemon
Grove, CA.
|
 |

|