Waste  Treatment 
Home
 

Waste  Treatment 
Overview
 

Solidification/  Stabilization 

Brownsfields 

Superfund Sites 

Resources 

FAQs 

Tech Support 

Stay Informed 

Radioactive 
Waste
 


     

Superfund Sites
Waste Treatment Home > Superfund Sites

S/S and Superfund Sites

According to EPA, 23% of Superfund remedial actions involving source control have used solidification/stabilization treatment.

Popularity of S/S treatment in the Superfund program can be attributed to the technology’s protectiveness of human health and the environment and cost-effectiveness in treating a wide range of hazardous constituents.

Examples of Superfund sites where S/S has been used:

New Bedford Harbor, New Bedford, Mass.

S/S treatment technology is enabling the EPA to cleanup the New Bedford Harbor Superfund Site while reusing the treated material to build a dewatering facility. The New Bedford site is a 18,000-acre estuary contaminated with polychlorinated biphyenyls (PCBs) and heavy metals. Cement-based S/S was used on a portion of the site to create new land for construction of a dewatering facility. Sediment with less than 50 ppm PCBs was treated by S/S and used as fill to an area behind bulkheads creating new land. For a more detailed description of this project click here. More.

Yellow Water Road, Baldwin, Fla

PCB-contaminated soils were treated and disposed on-site on this Superfund remedial action. PCB concentrations in of the soil exceeded 600 ppm. More.

Peak Oil/Bay Drum, Tampa, Fla.

The Peak Oil Superfund site is situated within a derelict industrial area of wetland. The former waste oil recycling plant site covered 15.5 acres and was contaminated with waste oil products, including PCBs and trichloroethylene. Lead was also present on the site. As a result of a previous remediation attempt (infrared heat treatment), a stockpile of contaminated ash was also present. The geology of the area was of variable drift and included sand, silt, clay, and peat. The area had a shallow water table with a low hydraulic gradient to the west. More.

90th South Battery Site, West Jordan, Utah
EPA Region 8 selected S/S to treat contaminated soil in an emergency response at the 90th South Battery Site. Lead and arsenic contaminated soils discovered during highway construction were treated on-site and reused as base for pavement used for composting operations at a local landfill. More.

Brunswick Wood Superfund Site, Brunswick, Ga.
The Brunswick Wood Preserving site in a former wood treating facility in Georgia, is using cement stabilization/solidification to remediate 84 acres (34 hectares). The facility used creosote, pentachlorophenol (PCP) with dioxin, and copper/chromium/arsenic (CCA) preservatives in the manufacturing of railroad ties, telephone poles, and pressure-treated lumber. Soil and sediment at the facility are contaminated with these polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), dioxin, and heavy metals. More.


EPA Publications about S/S at Superfund Sites: (Click on title for link)

 

Slurry Walls for Waste Management

Brodhead Creek, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania

Slurry walls are used in waste management to control the flow of groundwater at contaminated sites. One of the earliest uses of slurry walls in EPA’s Superfund program was at Brodhead Creek Site in Pennsylvania. The 12-acre site is the location of a former coal gasification plant which operated along the west bank of Brodhead Creek in the Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. In 1981, EPA took steps to stop the seepage of coal tar from the site into the creek by constructing an underground cement-bentonite slurry wall. The slurry wall was installed between the toxic coal tar deposits and the creek. The 12-inch wide (30cm) 638-foot (194-m) long trenched wall ranged in depth from 18 to 23 feet (5.5-7m). The slurry wall was part of the remedy for Operable Unit 1 of the site. Although some coal tar as source material of contamination was pumped from the site, EPA determined that complete removal of the residual coal tar would be technically unworkable due to site-specific constraints. Both the first 5-year review (1999) and second 5-year review (2004) of the remedy completed by EPA indicated that the remedy including the slurry wall continues to be protective of human health and the environment. More.


 
Careers | Sitemap | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | © 2008 Portland Cement Association - All Rights Reserved