Water Resources 
Home
 

Water Resources  Overview 

Soil-Cement 

Roller- Compacted  Concrete 

RCC Database 

Resources 

Find a Cement  Supplier 

Find a Contractor 

Stay Informed 


Roller-Compacted Concrete Projects
Water Resources Home > Roller Compacted Concrete > Recent Projects > Franklin Dam

RCC Dam Saves City’s Sole Source of Water Supply

Stephen L. Whiteside, P.E., CDM, and Fares Y. Abdo, P.E., PCA


Franklin Dam is located in a rural area along the West Fork Drakes Creek in Franklin, Kentucky. The dam impounds water from a watershed encompassing approximately 108 square miles (280 km2). Its primary purpose is to serve as the City's sole municipal water supply.

Aerial view of original dam prior to replacement.
Aerial view of original dam prior to replacement.
The original 16-foot (4.2-m) high dam was built in 1975 to impound the immediate creek area. In 1987 the dam was raised 6 feet (1.8 m) to increase storage capacity. The modified dam consisted of an 80-foot (24.4-m) long concrete gravity spillway section adjacent to the left abutment and a 500-foot (152.4-m) long embankment extending from the spillway to the right abutment. The embankment consisted of a tiered gabion wall along the downstream section and dredged material placed on a 3H:1V slope on the upstream section. A filter fabric separated the fill from the gabion wall. A membrane on the upstream slope served as a seepage barrier. The top portion of the upstream slope, the dam crest, and the area within about 18 feet (5.5 m) from the downstream toe of the dam were protected against normal overtopping by a 9-inch (230-mm) thick gabion mat with a thin concrete overlay. Even after the raising of the dam, it was still overtopped several times a year.

In 1996, a large flood event overtopped the dam and caused severe damage and voids in the dam. The dam was repaired by installing sand bags within the embankment portion. However, in spite of the repairs extensive seepage took place through and beneath the dam. Sinkholes developed at several locations and required additional repairs.

Replacement Dam

Due to the progressive deterioration of the dam, the City engaged the team of CDM of Louisville, Kentucky, and Raleigh, North Carolina, and Barge Waggoner Sumner and Cannon (BWSC) of Nashville, Tennessee, to evaluate the feasibility of either repairing the existing dam or replacing it with a new dam. Rehabilitation of the existing dam was ruled out because of its poor condition, and it was decided to replace the existing dam with a new dam immediately downstream.

The design team conducted a geotechnical investigation to evaluate the subsurface conditions at potential locations for a new dam. Based on the results of the investigation, they concluded that the new dam should be located about 100 feet (30.5 m) downstream of the existing dam, and that the normal pool should be kept at the same elevation. By maintaining the normal pool at the same elevation as the existing dam, upstream environmental impacts would be minimal. It would also reduce the need for land acquisitions and make permitting efforts less cumbersome. In addition, it would avoid karst features located further downstream of the dam.

The team evaluated a range of alternatives—conventional concrete dam, embankment dam with overtopping protection, and roller-compacted concrete (RCC) dam. Based on the results of the geotechnical investigation and hydrologic/hydraulic analyses, an RCC dam with a conventional concrete spillway was selected as the preferred alternative.


A general view during construction.
A general view during construction.
The RCC dam was designed to withstand overtopping flows during the Probable Maximum Flood, with flood depths up to 8 feet (2.4 m) above the top of the dam. The new dam is 450-feet (137.2-m) long and has a maximum height of 20 feet (6.1 m). It has a vertical upstream face. The upper portion of the downstream face is sloped at 0.8H:1V. Below the sloped portion, the dam is shaped to form a basin sloped from the right abutment to the spillway. See photo of completed dam. This basin routes water during overtopping events toward the spillway and the creek main channel.


Spreading mortar to control seepage and bond RCC lifts downstream from facing concrete.
Spreading mortar to control seepage and bond RCC lifts downstream from facing concrete.
The design included conventional concrete facing on the upstream and downstream faces. A reinforced-concrete armor cap along the crest of the dam and on the downstream portion was also included to reduce the potential for damage from large trees and other debris during overtopping events. The dam is founded on bedrock about 10 to 12 feet (3.0 to 3.7 m) below existing ground surface. An RCC apron and 6-foot (1.8-m) deep cutoff wall are located immediately downstream of the dam to reduce the potential for erosion during overtopping events. Seepage control was provided by the use of the conventional concrete facing systems, crack inducers with water stops spaced at approximately 15 feet (4.5 m) on center, and bedding mortar between RCC lifts for an approximate width of 10 feet (3.0 m) immediately behind the upstream concrete facing.

The spillway is an 80-foot (24.4-m) long ogee spillway constructed with conventional concrete. It is keyed 5 feet (1.5 m) into bedrock for stability and seepage cutoff. The spillway has a 40-foot (12.2-m) long stilling basin.

Completed dam.
Completed dam.

ASI-RCC, Inc. of Buena Vista, Colorado, was the low bidder for the project. Construction started in late January 2005 and was completed in February 2006. The project required approximately 8,160 yd3 (6,240 m3) of RCC and 5,560 yd3 (4,250 m3) of conventional concrete. The in-place cost of RCC (including cost of aggregate, cement, fly ash, mixing, transporting, placing, and curing) was $135/yd3 ($176.56/m3). The total construction cost was about $4,776,000, approximately $200,000 below the total bid amount.

RCC Mix Design
Type II portland cement 205 lb/yd3 (122 kg/m3)
Class F fly ash 105 lb/yd3 (62 kg/m3)
Aggregate
(1-1/2 in. (37.5 mm) MSA)
3,628 lb/yd3 (2,152 kg/m3)
Water 202 lb/yd3 (120 kg/m3)
Specified 28-day compressive strength 3,000 psi (20.7 MPa)

Download a PDF of this case study.

 








More on RCC:
Estimating RCC Costs for Dams
Performance of RCC
Recent Projects
FAQs
RCC Database
RCC/Soil Cement Contractor Directory

Credits

Owner: City of Franklin, Ky.

Designer: CDM and Barge Waggoner Sumner and Cannon

RCC Mix Design and QA Testing: CDM

Contractor: ASI-RCC, Inc.

 
Careers | Sitemap | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | © 2009 Portland Cement Association - All Rights Reserved