Cement 
Manufacturing 
Home
 

Manufacturing 
Technical 
Committee 


Technical Info 

How Cement 
is Made 


About the 
Cement 
Industry 


Cement 
History 


Virtual 
Plant Tour 


Resources 


Cement Manufacturing
Cement Manufacturing Home > Pack Set



The Problems with Pack Set

Bulk cement shipment by truckThe laws of physics have not changed since their discovery—and neither has the problem of pack set. Primarily affecting bulk cement shipping, but also present in storage facilities, pack set is the resistance of cement particles to the onset of flow.

When finely ground particles are stored and exposed to vibration, they will consolidate. Bulk cement shipped from manufacturing plants by rail car or truck provides a classic example. During discharge, the consolidated, bulk cement may resist flowing. The initial resistance to the onset of flow is called pack set. The biggest problems with pack set are the time delays in handling bulk cement shipments. These delays can be significant enough. But even without the delays, customer misperceptions related to pack set can strain well-established business relationships. Add to this the further confusion between pack set and warehouse set. Warehouse set is a condition arising from surface hydration of stored cement particles in the presence of moisture.

When did this problem begin? With the increasing transition to bulk cement shipments beginning in the 1970’s, there has been an increased awareness of this problem. However, relatively little research has been conducted. Why? The simple reason is that pack set exists more as a phenomenon than as a problem plaguing the industry. Some manufacturers experience pack set regularly in storage silos on site; some only occasionally with bulk shipments. Others see it regularly with a specific cement type. Still others hear of problems only from the occasional customer. With this kind of sporadic occurrence, tracking the cause of the pack set is difficult.

In 2003, ASTM C1565 Standard Test Method for Determination of Pack-Set Index of Portland Cement was adopted. Long utilized by manufacturing and testing facilities (at least since the 1950’s), this method provides a measure for examining the potential for pack set for a cement. The procedure uses a flask filled with cement and applies a consolidation effort using a measured vibration voltage. The flask is then rotated in the horizontal position until the compacted bed collapses. The number of half-turns yields a pack-set index indicating the relative force required to overcome the consolidation effort. This index can be used by manufacturers to assess the tendency for their product to experience pack set with vibration. The higher the number; the greater the tendency for pack set. A pack set of 3 or more is generally considered problematic.

But why does this phenomenon occur? The reason for pack set is not completely understood. The current perspective centers on a complex relationship between the surface energy of the individual cement grains and the flow of those same particles. Surface energy is affected by many factors in the cement manufacturing process: fineness of grinding, type of grinding equipment, kiln temperature, clinker temperature at quenching, the rate of cooling, and the type and use of grinding aids. When large surface charges exist (due to unbalanced valence forces) and compactive effort is supplied (as with bulk shipment), pack set is more likely to occur.

What can be done to reduce pack set? The use of cement additives dates back to the 1930’s and has proven very effective in enhancing the manufacture and handling of bulk cement as well as the performance of cement in concrete. Grinding aids act to satisfy the surface charges developed on the cement particles. This action then provides resistance to pack set and improves flowability by reducing particle agglomeration.


References

Bhatty, J.I., Miller F.M., and Kosmatka, S.H., Innovations in Portland Cement Manufacturing, SP400, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2004, 1370 pages.

“Pack Set: Cause and Prevention”, Processing Additives Technical Bulletin 3, Grace Construction Products, September 1977, 4 pages.

Strohman, Nile R., “Additives from TDA to Polyfon T”, ASTM Standardization News, November 2002.

Strohman, Nile R., Private communication with the author September 6, 2005.

 



 
Careers | Sitemap | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | © 2008 Portland Cement Association - All Rights Reserved